Yes, we can have housing and trees. Housing versus trees is a false dichotomy, but construction companies try to convince the public otherwise.
In 2024, over 2,000 trees have been removed. The single largest reason to cut healthy, large trees was for construction projects.
Here’s the catch: almost all of the removed trees were on infill lots, which already had buildings on them — meaning the trees were on the perimeter of the property, not in the buildable area. Evaluations by certified architects show that in almost all instances, builders could have kept these large trees and developed the maximum amount of housing that the zoning code allows.
The developer lobby — who influenced, lobbied for and helped pass the current tree ordinance against the advice of scientists, advocates and the Urban Forestry Commission — has tried to fight us on that point. In 2021, it claimed that trees on properties reduce its ability to build housing and therefore drive down profits. Seattle’s hearing examiner took no time to slash down that argument. After reviewing nearly 100 pages of notes and three days of testimony, the hearing examiner determined that MBAKS’ argument was unequivocally false.
Learn more from The Seattle Times, and check out our blog post on simple ways to build with trees.